Amazon’s Cloud Storage Hits Stormy Weather

Amazon’s S3 service ran into some stormy weather on Sunday when technical glitches knocked the company’s “cloud” storage offline for several hours. The company’s service — also known as “Simple Storage Service” — offers storage hosted “in the cloud,” on Amazon’s servers. But the service went offline for three hours when communication problems among S3’s […]

執筆者
Judy Mottl
Judy Mottl
Published: Jul 21, 2008
Updated: Feb 17, 2021
3 minute read
Enterprise Storage Forum のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Amazon’s S3 service ran into some stormy weather on Sunday when technical glitches knocked the company’s “cloud” storage offline for several hours.

The company’s service — also known as “Simple Storage Service” — offers storage hosted “in the cloud,” on Amazon’s servers. But the service went offline for three hours when communication problems among S3’s hosts prohibited the servers from interacting properly, spokespeople said.

To restore service, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) was forced to take the entire system offline to restore communication aspects and then re-launch it several hours later, an Amazon spokeswoman said. She added that further details of the problem would be forthcoming.

“These are sophisticated systems and it generally takes a while to get to root cause in such a situation,” she said. “We will be providing our customers with more information when we’ve fully investigated the incident. We’re proud of our operational performance but any downtime is unacceptable and we won’t be satisfied until it is perfect.”

While its technicians were working to restore service, Amazon provided frequent updates on its Service Health Dashboard Web site — a change from how it handled matters during the service’s earlier outage in February.

The provider came under fire from users for not providing more details during that several-hour crash, which it later attributed to overloaded authentication problems. It took Amazon two weeks to inform customers what exactly had happened.

In April, the company launched the Service Health Dashboard Web site, which Amazon said had been in development since before the February downtime, and did not come in response to user complaints.

Growing Pains

Amazon S3 and other cloud options are increasingly popular with both small companies and power users, such as developers, who need low-cost data backup and disaster recovery services. Yet, as one analyst said, such outages illustrate the technology is still in the early days of development.

“All providers are going through some growing pains,” said Henry Baltazar, an analyst at the 451 Group. “The timing was good on [Amazon’s outage] since it was Sunday and not during the workweek.”

Advertisement

As with any hosted service, downtime and meeting service level agreements (SLAs) are huge factors for survival in the increasingly competitive marketplace for cloud storage.

According to Amazon’s SLA, the service will “store data durably, with 99.99 percent availability. There can be no single points of failure. All failures must be tolerated or repaired by the system without any downtime.”

Whether Amazon’s track record hurts its long-term chances remains to be seen. HP (NYSE: HPQ), for one, suffered an outage in the first two weeks of its Upline service. But it’s clear that there’s a growing list of companies ready to move in on its turf, including storage powerhouse EMC’s Mozy service and newcomers such as Nirvanix.

Just last week, for instance, EMC (NYSE: EMC) debuted software for companies to manage both their online storage through Mozy as well as their local storage on EMC’s Iomega hard disk drives.

Additionally, pricing for cloud storage continues to drop, and is now as low a $5 a month per gigabyte — Mozy’s service price. As a result, price is no longer the deciding factor in choosing a cloud provider, according to industry watchers.

In the future, according to one player in the field, the field may be further upset by cloud storage solutions tailored to specific customer needs.

“There is no need to have a super-mega-cloud to realize cloud storage benefits,” said Sajai Krishnan, CEO of Parascale, which makes software for companies to build their own in-house storage services.

“For example, regional and specialized cloud storage vendors could provide different kinds of clouds for different kinds of applications, such as fast streaming media versus 50-year archives, to enable better SLAs,” he said.

In general, cloud storage is pretty robust, Krishnan said — although he added that as with any new technology, there is the potential for occasional glitches.

Article courtesy of InternetNews.com

Enterprise Storage Forum Logo

Enterprise Storage Forum offers practical information on data storage and protection from several different perspectives: hardware, software, on-premises services and cloud services. It also includes storage security and deep looks into various storage technologies, including object storage and modern parallel file systems. ESF is an ideal website for enterprise storage admins, CTOs and storage architects to reference in order to stay informed about the latest products, services and trends in the storage industry.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。