E-Discovery Ruling Gives Companies Another Data Worry

As if the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) hadn’t given companies enough to worry about, now a judge’s ruling means that companies need to be ready to produce metadata in legal cases too. Guidance Software (NASDAQ: GUID) issued an alert today saying that in a recent court case (Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement […]

執筆者
Paul Shread
Paul Shread
Published: Jan 11, 2009
Updated: Feb 17, 2021
2 minute read
Enterprise Storage Forum のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

As if the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) hadn’t given companies enough to worry about, now a judge’s ruling means that companies need to be ready to produce metadata in legal cases too.

Guidance Software (NASDAQ: GUID) issued an alert today saying that in a recent court case (Aguilar v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement Div. of U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec.), a U.S. District Court ruled that metadata associated with e-mails and electronic files must be preserved, maintained and produced in the course of legal discovery, particularly when sought by the requesting party in its initial request.

The ruling opens up another area where companies could be hit with steep fines for failing to produce electronic documents in court cases — and could mean more business for e-discovery vendors.

The Aguilar decision and recent guidance from the Sedona Conference emphasize the importance of metadata preservation in the course of e-discovery, said Guidance Chief Strategy Officer John Patzakis, who said metadata can be used for authentication, search and analysis while also offering evidentiary value such as when the file was created or accessed.

Patzakis and Guidance Deputy General Counsel Patrick Zeller said Guidance’s EnCase eDiscovery software preserves metadata throughout the e-discovery process by handling all files on a read-only basis in their original formats, avoiding the need to reset file metadata to its original state.

Brian Babineau, senior analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, said companies “should already be using technologies that capture and preserve metadata throughout the discovery process, as metadata is often used to run initial collections and searches. If they are not currently using technologies that preserve metadata, they are not really helping themselves, as the integrity of any data collected, analyzed and produced could be questioned. Now they don’t have a choice.”

Babineau said the ruling affects users who “leverage specific technologies like archive hardware and software, search solutions and data review tools to support electronic discovery processes. … Specifically for storage administrators, they should be prepared to retain more information on WORM format, as this can help preserve the data and metadata throughout the process.”

Babineau cited Kazeon, Autonomy Zantaz and Recommind as other e-discovery vendors that preserve metadata.

Advertisement

Back to Enterprise Storage Forum

Enterprise Storage Forum Logo

Enterprise Storage Forum offers practical information on data storage and protection from several different perspectives: hardware, software, on-premises services and cloud services. It also includes storage security and deep looks into various storage technologies, including object storage and modern parallel file systems. ESF is an ideal website for enterprise storage admins, CTOs and storage architects to reference in order to stay informed about the latest products, services and trends in the storage industry.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。