Study Tracks Hard Drive Reliability and Annual Failure Rates (AFR)

On average, hard drives fail after two and a half years, according to new results of an ongoing study published by specialized storage cloud platform provider Backblaze. The Drive Stats report analyzes quarterly and lifetime hard drive reliability and failure rates. The latest edition looks at the first three months of 2023 and shares the […]

執筆者
Chris Bernard
Chris Bernard
May 4, 2023
2 minute read
Enterprise Storage Forum のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

On average, hard drives fail after two and a half years, according to new results of an ongoing study published by specialized storage cloud platform provider Backblaze. The Drive Stats report analyzes quarterly and lifetime hard drive reliability and failure rates. The latest edition looks at the first three months of 2023 and shares the average age of failed hard drives by drive size, model, and more to help IT decision-makers shopping for new storage drives for their businesses.

Hardware durability is a critical component of the cloud storage industry. With nearly 250,000 hard drives housed globally across its data centers, Backblaze analyzes and publishes quarterly findings to highlight key trends and data points.

The company began the study a decade ago. It looks at Annual Failure Rate (AFR) by size, model, and manufacturer, and further breaks down the information by average age of hard drive at failure. According to the report’s author, Andrew Klein, the AFR for the first quarter of 2023 was 1.54%, up over the first quarter of 2022 at 1.22%.

“Quarterly AFR numbers can be volatile, but can be useful in identifying a trend which needs further investigation,” Klein wrote.

Annual Failure Rates

The average AFR over the last decade was was 1.4%. Among drives with more than 2.2 million days of use, the drive with the lowest AFR (.28%) is a Western Digital Corporation 16TB model. The drive with the highest AFR (2.57%) is a Seagate 4TB model.

Backblaze hard drives lifetme annualized failure rates.
While the Seagate drives generally showed higher failure rates overall, they also cost less, the report noted. “You could make a good case that for us, many Seagate drive models are just as cost-effective as more expensive drives,” Klein wrote. View the Drive Stats summary and see the full data set from the study at https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html.
Chris Bernard

Chris Bernard is managing editor of eWeek. He brings more than 15 years of experience covering how organizations select, implement, and deploy technology to the role. He’s also worked as a newspaper and magazine journalist in Alaska and New England, a technical writer for several startups, and as senior copywriter for a B2B advertising agency. Previously, he was managing editor of Datamation and Enterprise Storage Forum.

Enterprise Storage Forum Logo

Enterprise Storage Forum offers practical information on data storage and protection from several different perspectives: hardware, software, on-premises services and cloud services. It also includes storage security and deep looks into various storage technologies, including object storage and modern parallel file systems. ESF is an ideal website for enterprise storage admins, CTOs and storage architects to reference in order to stay informed about the latest products, services and trends in the storage industry.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。