What Is EMC Up to by Buying Legato?

Enterprise Storage Forum content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

EMC’s bid to acquire Legato Software Tuesday for $1.3 billion has caught the attention of analysts that follow the sector and has quelled debate over whether or not the deal, rumored as far back as a year, would happen.

Now that it has, a different debate has arisen. While most analysts have lauded the deal, EMC rivals are questioning the Hopkinton, Mass.-based company’s strategy of becoming a large software maker through acquisitions like Legato and BMC’s storage software line last week.

The crux of the Legato deal is that EMC will fold in Legato’s e-mail archiving, information protection and recovery, and additional storage management solutions to boost its own storage software lines. The push comes as competitors such as VERITAS , IBM , HP , Computer Associates , and Sun Microsystems strive to augment their own storage software solutions.

The expansion of EMC’s software lines is part of a company-wide, full-court press on information lifecycle management (ILM), which is also referred to as data lifecycle management by some companies. The strategy involves the ability to manage data from “cradle to grave,” in industry parlance, from the moment data is created or received, to when it is tucked away in an archive, and finally to when it is expunged from the network.

With the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation in Congress, corporations are now taking greater interest in making sure digital documents are preserved in order to comply with accounting standards in the bill, which was sparked by a wave of corporate accounting scandals in the last few years.

The heightened interest could prove to be good timing for the Legato products that EMC gets in the deal, which include Disk Extender (DX) and Email Extender (EX). Legato possesses this disk and e-mail archiving technology thanks to its own acquisition
of OTG for $403 million last year. Now, along with Legato’s homebrewed backup-and-recovery products like NetWorker and management tools such as
AlphaStor, EMC is expected to reap the products’ rewards.

Analysts Weigh In on the Deal

Analysts are speaking favorably of the deal between EMC and Legato, and note that some competitors could be affected more than others.

“I think this is a really good deal for EMC; if they successfully integrate the Legato products with their own solutions, they will have a true Enterprise
Storage Management portfolio, which requires tools that do asset and performance management, automated data valuation and migration, and backup and recovery,” says Enterprise Storage Group Senior Analyst Nancy Marrone. “Each piece is needed for full ILM functionality, and EMC didn’t have some significant pieces before this acquisition.”

Marrone’s colleague, Enterprise Storage Group Senior Analyst Peter Gerr, believes the deal gives Legato, an independent software vendor, longer term
viability for their backup products. “I think they had done most of what they could have done in the backup world &8211; their play towards a more open software framework a few years ago (GEMS) hasn’t really borne fruit, and I think they continue to struggle against bigger companies (VERITAS, IBM, CA) that might or might not have ‘better’ backup solutions, but they’re ‘good enough.'”

Gerr says buying Legato less than a week after picking up BMC’s storage software assets gets EMC’s “software feet on the street,” meaning software, sales and marketing, and development staff are in place where they were lacking before.

“It’s becoming more and more clear that EMC has acquired a good amount of software intellectual property with the other smaller companies it has acquired, and is now building the go-to-market strategy to launch itself into being a ‘software company.’ It would have taken too long to build that organically,” says Gerr.

Analyst Charles King, of The Sageza Group, says the EMC/Legato deal adds an interesting twist to an already competitive storage software market.

“For enterprise systems vendors that are pursuing their own storage software strategies, the EMC/LEGATO deal means that an already tough opponent has gotten measurably tougher,” King said in a research note. “The combination of capabilities offered by EMC/LEGATO is well able to go toe-to-toe with IBM/Tivoli’s storage solutions, and leaves HP’s own storage software products looking somewhat anemic in comparison.”

Page 2: Competitors Shrug

Competitors Shrug

But if EMC’s competitors in the storage space are sweating about the Legato purchase, they’re awfully good at masquerading under a veil of nonchalance.
Don Langeberg, director of marketing, HP Storage Software Division, disagrees with King’s assessment that the purchase leaves HP’s own data lifecycle management portfolio in the dust.

Then again, he stresses that HP comes at the whole idea of DLM, as HP prefers to call it, from an IT angle, not a storage angle. That is to say, HP partners with legion firms to tap the technologies they don’t make, such as data archiving and data back-up. In fact, HP enjoys such a partnership
with Legato.

“I don’t quite understand that,” Langeberg says of King’s statement. “Our partnerships are our strength. We don’t have a single pony to ride in the data archiving and management space. We partner with Legato, but we also partner with Ixos Software, Persist Technologies, and KVS to bring customers best-of-breed solutions.”

As for how it looks for EMC, Langeberg more or less yawned. “From our perspective, Legato is not a dominant offering. There is no one answer to the data lifecycle management offering, and by acquiring Legato, that’s interesting, but it’s a small part of the puzzle.

“Of course, I say this with the caveat that EMC will continue to honor that partnership,” he said, acknowledging that HP’s fate with Legato is held in
the balance by EMC, ultimately. “EMC could fall back into their proprietary ways with this.”

Even so, Langeberg acknowledges that HP enjoys cooperative competition partnerships with companies such as VERITAS &8211; they compete vigorously on storage area network (SAN) software, but HP employs VERITAS’ data archiving and back-up and restore software. Therefore, he doesn’t see any reason why the same can’t be said for HP and EMC when and if it succeeds in buying Legato.

A source close to IBM discussed the purchase in similar fashion, noting that EMC’s decision to keep its sales force separate from Legato’s bears a striking resemblance to the way IBM handled its Tivoli acquisition.

“On one hand, they’re trying to replicate IBM’s strategy in not only hardware, but now software…but as far as extending up to the system level — going from the devices to storage management, they fall short,” the source said. “Focusing on the lifecycle of the data is important and Legato’s OTG stuff might give them a quick fix, but it can’t scale that to enterprise content management because it’s limited in its type of data archiving. They don’t really have all the communications pieces yet that the SEC regulations and Sarbanes-Oxley require. I’m talking different documents — from online to paper documents, and Web content.”

“It’s hard to digest large acquisitions, but with this it seems they are trying to go from being a hardware company to an open software company,” the source said. “Those are two different cultures. This deal could really help them or backfire. It will be interesting to see how they integrate this

Most agree the greatest negative impact the EMC/Legato deal could have would be on VERITAS, which is fighting to metamorphose into a systems management company from its previously comfortable position as a storage software management company. Though VERITAS did not respond to this story in time for publication, analysts spoke about the issue.

“The biggest potential loser in the deal could be VERITAS, which as the largest ISV in a continually expanding market also represents the biggest target,” Sageza’s King said.

The source close to IBM said: “VERITAS is trying to go from a backup-restore company to a systems management business, and they are being pushed on both
ends — on the systems management side by IBM, as well as pressure on their storage management from EMC.”

But even EMC President and CEO Joseph Tucci says this is a more likely possibility down the road, as the firms align their storage programs to go head to head.

Separating the Sales Forces and Other Concerns

One of the heavily debated questions after Tucci spoke about the deal in a conference call earlier this week was: “Why did you keep the Legato and EMC
sales forces separate while everything else will be integrated?”

Enterprise Storage Group’s Marrone says, “We believe the sales force is separate at this time because of the channels — Legato’s channels need to be assured that it will be business as usual, and keeping the sales separate should help EMC maintain the Legato channels. I personally believe that EMC will need a separate software sales force that understands the full solution sale in order to effectively sell all of the solutions, and eventually there should be one software sales group that ‘sells all of the heterogeneous storage management solutions.'”

But just as those concerns might be allayed, many other questions remain on the minds of analysts and rivals.

Forrester Research analyst Anders Lofgren questions whether or not EMC’s gobbling of Legato will scare off Legato customers. “There might be some customers who don’t want Legato to get involved with a hardware company. It will be interesting to see what EMC does with them.”

Others wonder about EMC’s software strategy as a whole.

“What about their other storage software acquisitions?” wonders the source close to IBM. “Are they going to keep operating them as separate software businesses or bring them under one house? Because I can tell you keeping them separate won’t work in the long-term.”

HP’s Langeberg has a more holistic question about EMC’s storage software initiative in which proprietary concerns were supposed to be dashed on the rocks of open, heterogeneous technology. “Whatever happened to Wide Sky?” he asks. “It’s as though it dropped off the face of the earth. That was their attempt at openness to get that proprietary monkey off of their back. Now this seems like an attempt at being a proprietary hardware company and an open software company at the same time.”

Tucci was asked similar questions on the conference call this week, and he made it clear that further details about how EMC plans to integrate some of its acquisitions would be forthcoming at the analyst meeting August 6.

This story originally appeared on Internet News.

Back to Enterprise Storage Forum

Clint Boulton
Clint Boulton
Clint Boulton is an Enterprise Storage Forum contributor and a senior writer for CIO.com covering IT leadership, the CIO role, and digital transformation.

Get the Free Newsletter!

Subscribe to Cloud Insider for top news, trends, and analysis.

Latest Articles

15 Software Defined Storage Best Practices

Software Defined Storage (SDS) enables the use of commodity storage hardware. Learn 15 best practices for SDS implementation.

What is Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)?

Fibre Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE) is the encapsulation and transmission of Fibre Channel (FC) frames over enhanced Ethernet networks, combining the advantages of Ethernet...

9 Types of Computer Memory Defined (With Use Cases)

Computer memory is a term for all of the types of data storage technology that a computer may use. Learn more about the X types of computer memory.