AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery

Enterprise Storage Forum content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More.

Companies use backup solutions to address critical issues that arise, including server fails, manual errors, or disasters striking when least expected. Consequently, data backup and recovery are crucial to efficiently managing an organization.

The use of additional drives or an off-site server to store enormous volumes of data allows for successful data backup systems. Without implementing these systems, data recovery becomes challenging and in the worst-case scenario, results in information loss and major business risk.

In light of this, companies should take the best data recovery companies into consideration for their data protection and recovery solutions. 

See below to learn all about how AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Azure Site Recovery, two leaders in the disaster recovery market, compare against each other:

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Portfolio

Businesses can save tremendous costs by eliminating idle recovery site resources and pay for full disaster recovery sites only when required. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (AWS Elastic DR) cuts back on data loss and downtime with the rapid and reliable recovery of cloud-based and on-premises apps with the help of minimal computing, feasible storage, and point-in-time recovery.

It even helps organizations gain immense flexibility at their elastic recovery site with the capacity to adjoin or cut off the replicating servers as required. Its core infrastructure is created to meet the security needs of global banks, the military, and other high-sensitivity organizations and industries.

With AWS Elastic DR, firms can retrieve their apps within minutes, irrespective of if the state isup-to-date or previous point. The security is backed up by a set of more than 300 security compliance and governance features and services. AWS holds 98 security standards with all the compliance certifications. Its 117 AWS services that hold customer data provide the capacity to encrypt data rigidly.

On the other hand, Azure Site Recovery is cost-effective, easy to deploy, and dependable, ensuring business continuity despite critical IT planned or unplanned outages. Azure aims to help business apps run seamlessly during such instances with its site recovery.

Adopting a BCDR (business continuity and disaster recovery) is important for businesses to keep their data secure. Azure helps businesses with site recovery by replicating workloads running on VMs (virtual machines) and physical machines irrespective of location. In other words, when an outage occurs at a secondary location, the business can fail over to a primary site and access applications from there.

All in all, with its backup service, Azure keeps important data recoverable, safe, and secure.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Partners

AWS Elastic DR boasts innumerable partners that engage in almost every field. AWS has brilliant partner stories in many industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, general public service, transport and logistics, media and entertainment, software and internet, aerospace, power and utility, retail, financial service, and CPG.

Some AWS partners that have gained successful leads include DXC Technology, which has leveled up customer experience with AWS’s cloud-based call centers. Others include MRG gas, Franklin Planner, TAG, ChaosSearch, Gett, Capgemini, and many more.

Comparatively, Azure Site Recovery holds a variety of partners around the globe. They include Heartland Business Systems, Silicon Networks, Icube Consultancy Services, Gig Werks, IT Partner (Office 365 and Azure Solutions), Aldridge, Computer Solutions East, OnPar Technologies, Vistas Cloud, Streamsets, and more.

Azure also offers flexible services to a number of industries, including agriculture, education, financial services, government, healthcare, hospitality, professional, transportation, and manufacturing.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 
Global Reach

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Use cases

AWS Elastic DR’s use cases include various services. Businesses can recover all their operations swiftly after unanticipated events like data center hardware failures or software issues. Under on-premises to AWS, it enables RTOs (recovery time objectives) of minutes and RPOs (recovery point objectives) of seconds.

AWS even assists in elevating resilience and meeting all of the standard requirements for business. By using AWS as a recovery site, companies create room for AWS to convert their cloud-based apps to run natively and seamlessly on AWS. In addition, AWS amplifies app resilience and assists in meeting accessibility goals for AWS-based apps. With AWS Elastic DR, businesses can recover apps in an entirely different AWS region.

Compared to AWS, Azure has a long list of use cases. With its site recovery, companies can set up and manage replication along with setting up a disaster recovery from region to region. Moreover, organizations can replicate VMware VMs to Azure; on-premises VMs to Azure; or any workload running on supported Azure VMs, including on-premises HyperV and Windows and Linux physical servers. These replications will cut down the costs of operating a secondary data center.

Besides this, Azure Site Recovery provides several other services. This includes keeping applications consistent over failover, testing without disruption, data resilience, customized recovery plans, and flexible failovers.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: User reviews

According to G2, AWS Elastic DR secures a 4.5-star rating out of 5 with a genuine review list of people recommending the same. From TrustRadius, AWS scores 8.5 out of 10, along with excellent reviews and ratings. In Capterra, users have rated AWS Elastic DR with a rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars.

Some users consider it a go-to platform for all data solutions. As a result, it reduces the upfront costs for businesses. But, users also feel that AWS can improve its technical support for customer assistance.

Compared to AWS, Azure Site Recovery also has a 4.5-star rating out of 5 on G2, along with considerable reviews. From TrustRadius, Azure secures an 8.6 out of 10 with exciting reviews. And on Capterra, Azure amassed a 4.6-star rating out of 5 with quite an appreciation review list.

According to the users, the Azure Site Recovery services are easy-to-use and serve excellently for small and medium-scale firms. It can be configured as per business workloads. Another significant benefit it offers is the increase in the speed of applications. Some users feel that more features could have been included in the Azure Site Recovery solutions and could also come up with flexible pricing plans.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 
G2 4.5 out of 5 4.5 out of 5
TrustRadius 8.5 out of 10 8.6 out of 10
Capterra 4.6 out of 5 4.6 out of 5
Overall ✅     

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Industry recognition

AWS Elastic DR uses the most extensive, reliable, and secure global cloud infrastructure. In terms of recognition, Gartner Research places AWS in the Leaders quadrant of the brand new 2021 Magic Quadrant for CIPS (Cloud Infrastructure & Platform Services).

In terms of this Magic Quadrant, CIPSs are denoted as standardized, superior automated offerings in which integrated platform services complement infrastructure resources (compute, storage, and networking). Millions of clients, including renowned largest enterprises, fastest-growing startups, and leading government agencies, all employ AWS to reduce costs, become more agile, and innovate faster.

Azure Site Recovery boasts another level of recognition. Right from business analytics to DevOps and IoT, businesses can leverage scalable and cost-effective economic solutions that go well with their current investments.

Azure extends its services in different fields like financial services, healthcare, government, retail, and manufacturing. Several companies have extended their appreciation, including ASOS, DAIMLER, and McKesson.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery: Overall

AWS Elastic DR touts the most dynamic community with millions and millions of active clients and customers worldwide. It holds more than 200 fully featured services and has provided outstanding solutions to over a million enterprises. Furthermore, AWS has been providing excellent cloud services to many clients for more than 16 years.

On the contrary, Azure Site Recovery is highly dedicated to securing large enterprise data. Serving the market for decades now, Azure has recovered unlimited data along with holding 90+ compliance offerings, making it the largest portfolio in the industry. Azure strives for customer satisfaction. Speaking of reliance, more than 95% of Fortune 500 companies rely on Azure and trust it for their business.

AWS Elastic DR and Azure Site Recovery support businesses with data recovery solutions and help them fully capitalize on their growth and performance. Based on your business requirements, you can choose services from any of these companies, as both have a stronghold on the market and offer the best products and services.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Azure Site Recovery 
Use Cases


Kashyap Vyas
Kashyap Vyas
Kashyap Vyas is a contributing writer to Enterprise Storage Forum. He covers a range of technical topics, including managed services, cloud computing, security, storage, business management, and product design and development. Kashyap holds a Master's Degree in Engineering and finds joy in traveling, exploring new cultures, and immersing himself in Indian classical and Sufi music. uns a consulting agency.

Get the Free Newsletter!

Subscribe to Cloud Insider for top news, trends, and analysis.

Latest Articles

15 Software Defined Storage Best Practices

Software Defined Storage (SDS) enables the use of commodity storage hardware. Learn 15 best practices for SDS implementation.

What is Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)?

Fibre Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE) is the encapsulation and transmission of Fibre Channel (FC) frames over enhanced Ethernet networks, combining the advantages of Ethernet...

9 Types of Computer Memory Defined (With Use Cases)

Computer memory is a term for all of the types of data storage technology that a computer may use. Learn more about the X types of computer memory.