Create a Disaster Recovery Plan by following these best practices and steps. Review a list of Disaster Recovery Services. Click here now.
For businesses, having a disaster recovery plan in place is not optional – it’s critical. Indeed, the recent spike in natural disasters has many organizations thinking about their business continuity plans.
Events like hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria; tornadoes in the Midwest and South, fires and floods in California and storms all across the nation affected thousands of businesses, causing some to go without power and Internet connectivity for days, weeks or even months.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2017 was the costliest year ever for the United States when it comes to natural disasters. The country experienced 16 different events that resulted in more than a billion dollars in damage each, with a total price tag of $306.2 billion.
And it isn’t just natural disasters that affect businesses — plenty of man-made events cause business slowdowns or shutdowns as well. Ransomware, civil disturbances, mass shootings, terrorism, and more mundane events likely faulty components, accidentally deleted files, misconfigured hardware or mistakenly cut power cables can knock businesses offline.
In order to be ready for these inevitable situations, experts recommend that large enterprises and small businesses alike put together a disaster recovery/business continuity (DR/BC) plan. And because so much of today’s business takes place digitally, that means making a plan for how to get IT systems back online after an outage.
Some people make the mistake of thinking that if they have backups, that’s enough. But true disaster recovery involves far more than just restoring files from backups.
In the case of a natural disaster, you’ll need a way to keep critical applications and services online during a power outage and/or loss of Internet connectivity. You’ll need a way for staff to communicate if normal phone lines, cell service and networks are down. And you’ll need a way to allow your knowledge employees to continue to work if their regular offices are damaged or destroyed. And while all this is taking place, you’ll need to make sure that you continue to meet your security and compliance obligations.
Depending on your industry, you might have other special needs. For example, healthcare facilities will need ways to get patients to safety. Educational institutions will need to provide a way for instructors to interact with students. Manufacturers may need access to alternate factory or warehouse locations, retailers might need different methods for getting goods to their stores, and so on. A complete disaster recovery plan will take all of these needs into account.
For a comprehensive guide to Disaster Recovery Planning, see the article here.
In order to recover from a disaster, you’re going to need a failover site, a place where you can store your backups and run your production workloads in the event that your primary data center goes offline. Organizations have several different options when it comes to selecting a DR site, and each has its own strengths and weaknesses. In general, it involves finding a balance between cost and the amount of control that the organization has over the process. The right option for you will depend on the size of your company, the skills you have in-house, the complexity of your environment, your security and compliance needs, and a variety of other factors.
The big benefit of this approach is that the organization has complete control over the backup and recovery process. But the biggest weakness is also that the organization has complete control over the backup and recovery process. Your internal staff may not have the specialized skills that DR vendors have, and that may be part of the reason why DR experts say that in-house DR is the most likely to fail in the event of an actual emergency.
This option might reduce expenses and eliminate some of the burdens associated with managing your DR site in-house, but it still is going to require a lot of time, effort and skill — not to mention travel for staff to go to the physical location. It does keep most of the control in the customer’s hands however, which might be necessary for some organizations with strict compliance requirements.
This approach gives more of the burden for disaster preparedness to the vendor, but it also takes some control out of the hands of the customer. Prices and available services may vary widely, so organizations will need to do a total cost of ownership (TCO) or return on investment (ROI) analysis to determine if this is the most cost-effective option for them
However, DRaaS might not meet all the compliance requirements faced by large organizations in certain industries. They generally also do not offer as much range for customization as the other DR site options.
| Type of Disaster Recovery Solution | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| In-House | ● Enterprise retains control of data, applications and processes ● Completely customizable |
● Expensive ● Requires staff time and skills ● More likely to fail in a disaster situation |
| Colocation | ● May be less expensive than owning your own data center ● Requires less time and expertise than owning your own data center ● Enterprise retains most control of data, applications and processes |
● Requires some staff time and skills ● Staff must physically travel to colocation site to deploy hardware |
| Managed Colocation | ● Vendor handles IT infrastructure deployment ● Remote infrastructure management ● May be more cost effective than other options |
● Less customer control over physical infrastructure ● Less capability for customization |
| Disaster Recovery as a Service | ● Vendor handles every aspect of disaster recovery ● May be more cost effective than other options |
● Might not meet compliance requirements ● Fewer customization options ● Customer has little control over hardware and processes |
| Type of Disaster Recovery Solution | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---|---|---|
| In-House | ● Enterprise retains control of data, applications and processes ● Completely customizable |
● Expensive ● Requires staff time and skills ● More likely to fail in a disaster situation |
| Colocation | ● May be less expensive than owning your own data center ● Requires less time and expertise than owning your own data center ● Enterprise retains most control of data, applications and processes |
● Requires some staff time and skills ● Staff must physically travel to colocation site to deploy hardware |
| Managed Colocation | ● Vendor handles IT infrastructure deployment ● Remote infrastructure management ● May be more cost effective than other options |
● Less customer control over physical infrastructure ● Less capability for customization |
| Disaster Recovery as a Service | ● Vendor handles every aspect of disaster recovery ● May be more cost effective than other options |
● Might not meet compliance requirements ● Fewer customization options ● Customer has little control over hardware and processes |
Whether you setup your DR solution on your own or use a managed hosting or DRaaS vendor, you’ll need to make sure that it meets your needs and fits within your budget. The questions below can help guide you to the right disaster recovery solution for your situation:
Your RTO is how long it takes to get your restored data and applications back up and running. For example, an RTO of five minutes means that in the event of an emergency you could failover to your DR systems and have everyone back to work again within five minutes.
Many organizations have different RTO and RPO numbers for different applications. For example, you might have an RPO of six hours for your email systems, but an RTO of 10 seconds for your transaction-processing systems.
| Data Center Tier | Redundancy Requirements | Availability | Downtime per year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | No redundancy | 99.671 percent | 28.8 hours |
| Tier 2 | Partially redundant power and cooling | 99.741 percent | 22 hours |
| Tier 3 | All components have at least one backup (N+1) | 99.982 percent | 1.6 hours |
| Tier 4 | All components have backups, and the data center will keep running even if all primary systems fail at once (2N+1) | 99.995 percent | 26.3 minutes |
| Data Center Tier | Redundancy Requirements | Availability | Downtime per year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | No redundancy | 99.671 percent | 28.8 hours |
| Tier 2 | Partially redundant power and cooling | 99.741 percent | 22 hours |
| Tier 3 | All components have at least one backup (N+1) | 99.982 percent | 1.6 hours |
| Tier 4 | All components have backups, and the data center will keep running even if all primary systems fail at once (2N+1) | 99.995 percent | 26.3 minutes |
How far should your disaster recovery site be from your primary site? Having a failover site nearby means less latency, and therefore, faster performance in a recovery situation. However, if your failover site is too close, you run the risk that the DR site will be affected by the same disaster that impacts your primary site. To answer this question, you’ll need to consider your geography, the risk of natural or manmade disasters, and your performance needs.
The list of companies that provide disaster recovery solutions is incredibly long. Those below are just a sampling of some of the better known DR providers, as well as a brief overview of the type of product and services each offers:
Cynthia Harvey is a freelance writer and editor based in the Detroit area. She has been covering the technology industry for more than fifteen years.
Enterprise Storage Forum offers practical information on data storage and protection from several different perspectives: hardware, software, on-premises services and cloud services. It also includes storage security and deep looks into various storage technologies, including object storage and modern parallel file systems. ESF is an ideal website for enterprise storage admins, CTOs and storage architects to reference in order to stay informed about the latest products, services and trends in the storage industry.
Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.